Urban Survival and the role of the middleman
Bookmark this page

• What links survival? Administrative or Christian centre, or official supply systems had effect did not guarantee continuity. Prosperous countryside not enough –what about Africa – N Italy and Oriens seem plausible for continuity – common factor stood at frontier distinct cultural, geographical, political zones need for contact and exchange. Trade and Culture of Byzantium – Lombardy and trans Alpine. 8^th century Venetia all pointed node trading network.
• Links to Hodge and Whitehouse development of gateway communities (Dorestad, Hamwih, Quentovic)- lacked independent aristocratic life – inheritance classical life. Exchange one factor – but not only one
• Political disintegration meant slow fragmenting of Roman networks of change + ending state requirement, loss of costly cosmopolitan lifestyle of great landowners; declining need for surplus and exchange.

Other Notes in this Category

1. Factors Transforming the city
2. Post-Roman unity, disintegration and renewal
3. Regional survey of urban change ad survivals
4. The 5^th century and after: the East
5. The ancient city: a centre of administration and a way of life
6. The Fifth Century and After: the West
7. The third-century crisis and the inscriptions of Aphrodisias
8. The transformation of classical cities and the Pirenne debate
9. Types of Post-Roman City
10. Urban Survival and the role of the middleman
11. Why and when did the ancient cities end?

Didn't find this useful?

• Visit Coursework.Info for over 14,000 GCSE, A-Level and University Essays