John Stuart Mill and Isaiah Berlin – The ends of life and the preliminaries of morality: by Richard
RevisionNotes.Co.Uk - Free Revision and Course Notes for UK Students
Home: University: Politics: JS Mill - On Liberty: Interpretations: John Stuart Mill and Isaiah Berlin – The ends of life and the preliminaries of morality: by Richard
Revision Notes
GCSE
A-Level
University
IB
User Options
Search
My Revision Notes
Bookmark Page
Contribute
Contribute Work
Other Sites
AcademicDB
Essay Writing Help

John Stuart Mill and Isaiah Berlin – The ends of life and the preliminaries of morality: by Richard
Bookmark this page

-         Isaiah Berlin view: though JSM avowed a commitment to utility, commitment not real. In support of the avowed commitment JSM was compelled to stretch the notions of happiness to the point of vacuity. His real commitment was to various distinct values such as indiv lib, variety, and justice. These values may in places make demands coinciding with utilitarianism, but they can’t be given a consistently utilitarian interpretation.

-         Wollheim rejects Berlin’s reading of Mill accepts JSM’s claim about himself: i.e. believes that JSM did remain a utilitarian &, as he said, continued to think as utility as the ultimate appeal on all ethical questions, but ‘in the largest sense’ of utility, ‘grounded in the permanent interests of man as a progressive being’. Central to Wollheim’s way of thinking about JSM that this significantly extends the notion of utility, but not to the point of vacuity – an imp qualification, which explains how JSM remained a utilitarian

-         Wollheim argues that JSM made a shift in his utilitarian morality in 2 stages:

-         1. A shift from a morality that employs a monistic conception of util’y → a pluralistic & hierarchical conception of utility.

-         2. Shift from morality with a pluralistic & hierarchical conception of util → pluralistic but non-hierarchical conception of utility.

-         Does the Shift in content succeed in restoring appeal to utilitarianism? First shift: primary principle hedonism/pleasure maximisation , secondary principles (e.g. education of mind, affection…) – they fix the agent’s ends. But at this stage they are subordinate to primary principle.

-         Care

Other Notes in this Category

  1. Jane O’Grady’s Introduction to On Liberty
  2. John Stuart Mill and Isaiah Berlin – The ends of life and the preliminaries of morality: by Richard
  3. John Stuart Mill and the Ends of Life: by Isaiah Berlin
  4. John Stuart Mill’s Art of Living: by Alan Ryan
  5. Mill’s Conception of Happiness & the Theory of Individuality: by John Gray
  6. Mill’s Defence of Liberty: by C.L. Ten
  7. Social Liberty and Free Agency – some ambiguities in Mill’s conception of freedom: by G.W. Smith

Didn't find this useful?

  • Visit Coursework.Info for over 14,000 GCSE, A-Level and University Essays

© UK-Learning 2001-3. Disclaimer, Feedback, Other Stuff.