Post-Keynesian Modifications to the Demand for Money
Bookmark this page

In many respects, question usefulness of distinguishing Transactions demand from Asset demand for cash as separate components in total MD.

1.      Baumol & the Interest Rate Sensitivity of Transactions Demands: Baumol (1952) implies that transactions demand for cash will respond inversely to interest rate changes (ceteris paribus: reinforces i. rate sensitivity of total MD). (Opportunity cost in i. foregone of cash balance but balanced vs costs of i. yielding assets – liquidation costs/inconvenience – indiv will seek to minimise these total costs.) So higher i. rate – decrease transactions demand for cash & vice-versa. + Note: If the act of liquidation costless, there would be no demand for transactions balances (intuitively appealing)

2.      Tobin (1958) & the Keynesian Asset Demand for Cash: reformulation of Keynesian demand for money to meet obj. that indivs’ll often hold speculative balances & financial assets. Allows it.

Other Notes in this Category

1. Classical Monetary Theory – The Traditional Quantity Theory
2. Essential Functions of Money
3. Introduction
4. Post-Keynesian Modifications to the Demand for Money
5. The Keynesian Analysis of the Demand for Money
6. The Revival of the Quantity Theory (Friedman & the ‘Chicago School’)

Didn't find this useful?

• Visit Coursework.Info for over 14,000 GCSE, A-Level and University Essays