Sasanian Persia
Bookmark this page

·        Previous dynasty very weak, fragmented, new regime intent on controlling more closely the territories it had inherited / expanding them

·        Better than Arsacids – irrigation doubled land available for cultivation.

·        Khuro I 6^th century – large centrlised government I Ctesipon – he initiated reforms.

·        Shapur I initial empire – initial continuity with predominantly feudal Pathians.

·        Quickly developed centralisation – no more regional minting and lessening noble power.

·        Shapur must have helped with canals – evidence early central administration in Sasanian period. Basically increased bureaucracy and centralisation – nobility never broken 3 and 5^th century instability. Linked to urban growth, especially in the the Persian heartlands

·        6^th century onwards standing army levy – presupposes organisational ability to coordinate campaigns before setting off. But significant time lag between thinking of it and setting off.

·        Unlike Parthians S gave food to troops not self sufficient - and tax, presence of pack animals, also sieges – some sort of system existed and functioned.

·        Unique among Rome’s neighbours in comparable degree of urban development, governmental organisation – uniquely among foreign peoples recognition of parity of status. Sarsanian Persia power to be both respected and feared – discussion Roman and Persian aims.

Other Notes in this Category

1. Aims
2. At the interface - The frontier Regions
3. Geographical Knowledge
4. Personnel
5. Resources for Foreign Relations, Records
6. Roman Aims
7. Sasanian Persia
8. Strategic Intelligence in relations with Persia

Didn't find this useful?

• Visit Coursework.Info for over 14,000 GCSE, A-Level and University Essays