Energy Resources - 2
Bookmark this page

Nuclear Power: e.g. France, Sellafield (UK)

• More efficient than rival fuels.

• Clean because it does not produce air pollution.
• Use little raw materials and there is still a large supply of Uranium.
• Can be made more efficient by research.
• Dangerous because of a possible meltdown or leakage of radiation.
• Difficult to dispose of waste materials (dangerous to local people).
• It is still non-renewable.
• The power stations cost much more than others.

Coal: e.g. Yorkshire

• Can be efficient.

• Non-renewable and there are only enough supplies to last 30-40 years.
• The cost of production of electricity from coal has increased.
• There is competition from oil which is cheaper.
• Causes air pollution.
• The remaining coal is difficult to get to (costs too much to mine it).
• Miners are in danger of losing their jobs.

Oil e.g. North Sea

• Cleaner than coal.

• Relatively safe to use.
• Easy to transport and to distribute.
• Does not create as much air pollution as coal.
• Prices fluctuate.
• Dangers of spillage.
• Expensive to find.

Hydroelectric Power: e.g. Kielder Water (UK)

• Clean

• Non pollution
• Power stations are cheap to run
• Can cause flooding.
• Dams must be built as well as power stations which cost a lot.
• Takes up large areas of land.

Wave power: (Severn Estuary)

• Cheap to run.

• Clean and non polluting.
• Only available to coastal areas.
• Affects marine life.
• Unreliable for continuous power.
• The technology needs development.

Other Notes in this Category

1. Bottling Plant and Control Systems
2. Energy Resources
3. Energy Resources - 2
4. London Urban Redevelopment Docklands Case Study
5. Seismographs
6. Shanty Towns: push and pull factors
7. Soil Erosion and acid rain
8. Trade, aid and interdependency

Didn't find this useful?

• Visit Coursework.Info for over 14,000 GCSE, A-Level and University Essays